Sort by
(393) Pooled Safety Analysis of Ten Clinical Studies Evaluating Fixed-Dose Oral Testosterone Undecanoate in Male Patients With Testosterone Deficiency

Abstract Introduction Oral testosterone undecanoate (TU) was approved outside the United States 50 years ago and is currently used in several countries for the treatment of men with testosterone deficiency. The efficacy of prior oral TU is limited by a short half-life, requiring frequent dosing and administration with meals. A novel formulation of fixed-dose TU is now indicated for the treatment of testosterone deficiency (FDA approved March 2022). In a phase 3 study (NCT03242590: 1021-16-002) evaluating the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral TU 225 mg twice daily in adult men with testosterone deficiency, oral TU was well tolerated and restored testosterone levels to eugonadal ranges in most patients. Objective The objective of this pooled analysis of ten clinical studies (LPCN 1021-09-001, S361.1.001, M12-778, M13-298, 1021-14-001, LPCN 1021-16-002, LPCN 1021-16-003, LPCN 1021-13-001, LPCN 1021-18-001, LPCN 1021-18-003) was to further evaluate the safety of fixed-dose TU administered to adult men with testosterone deficiency. Methods This pooled analysis included men with testosterone deficiency who were enrolled or randomized in one of ten clinical studies and received at least one dose of study drug, which included fixed-dose TU, dose-adjusted TU, or topical testosterone gel. Data from separate studies were allocated to defined treatment groups, and these data were pooled to present a safety summary of patients treated with fixed-dose TU. Treatment groups were defined as follows: all fixed-dose TU patients, active control patients (dose-adjusted TU or topical testosterone gel), and placebo patients. Participants in a crossover study of various fixed-dose TU doses were counted once overall for analysis, and data relating to the highest dose were used. Results Overall, 777 patients were included in this pooled analysis: 654 received fixed-dose TU, 104 received topical testosterone gel, 34 received dose-adjusted TU, and 18 received placebo. Baseline characteristics are available on Table 1. Among 654 patients who received fixed-dose TU, 549 (83.9%) patients completed their respective study, and 15 (2.3%) patients discontinued because of an AE. The most frequently occurring treatment-emergent related adverse events (AEs) for patients treated with fixed-dose TU included headache (10 [1.5]), hematocrit increase (8 [1.2]), and acne (6 [0.9]) (Table 2). Three (0.5%) patients receiving fixed-dose TU experienced a blood pressure increase and 13 (2.0%) exhibited hypertension. No patients receiving fixed-dose TU experienced an increase in hepatic enzymes. The mean change from baseline (SD) in hematocrit (HCT) for patients receiving fixed-dose TU was 0.003% (0.029); three patients receiving fixed-dose TU discontinued because of HCT >54%. No patients in this pooled analysis experienced a serious AE (SAE) related to study treatment, and no deaths occurred. Conclusions In this pooled analysis of ten clinical studies in male patients with testosterone deficiency, fixed-dose TU was well tolerated with no hepatic adverse events, no drug-related SAEs, and no deaths. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Halozyme (previously Antares) Clarification Industry initiated, executed and funded study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Halozyme (previously Antares)

Open Access
Relevant
Heterologous CoronaVac plus Ad5-nCOV versus homologous CoronaVac vaccination among elderly: a phase 4, non-inferiority, randomized study

AbstractImportancePeople over 60 developed less protection after two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine than younger people. Heterologous vaccination might provide greater immunity and protection against variants of concern.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous immunization with an adenovirus type 5-vectored vaccine (Convidecia) among elderly who were primed with an inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) previously.DesignAn observer-blind, randomized (1:1) trial, conducted from August 26 to November 13, 2021.SettingA single center in Jiangsu Province, China.Participants299 participants aged 60 years and older, of them 199 primed with two doses of CoronaVac in the past 3-6 months and 100 primed with one dose of CoronaVac in the past 1-2 months.InterventionConvidecia or CoronaVac as boosting doseMain Outcomes and MeasuresGeometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies against wild-type SARS-CoV-2, and Delta and Omicron variants 14 days post boosting, and adverse reactions within 28 days.ResultsIn the three-dose regimen cohort (n=199; mean (SD) age, 66.7 (4.2) years; 74 (37.2%) female), 99 and 100 received a third dose of Convidecia (group A) and CoronaVac (group B), respectively. In the two-dose regimen cohort (n=100; mean (SD) age, 70.5 (6.0) years; 49 (49%) female), 50 and 50 received a second dose of Convidecia (group C) and CoronaVac (group D), respectively. GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 at day 14 were 286.4 (95% CI: 244.6, 335.2) in group A and 48.2 (95% CI: 39.5, 58.7) in group B, with GMT ratio of 6.2 (95% CI: 4.7, 8.1), and 70.9 (95% CI: 49.5, 101.7) in group C and 9.3 (95% CI: 6.2, 13.9) in group D, with GMT ratio of 7.6 (95% CI: 4.1, 14.1). There was a 6.3-fold (GMTs, 45.9 vs 7.3) and 7.5-fold (32.9 vs 4.4) increase in neutralizing antibodies against Delta and Omicron variants in group A, respectively, compared with group B. However, there was no significant difference between group C and group D. Both heterologous and homologous booster immunizations were safe and well tolerated.Conclusions and RelevanceHeterologous prime-boost regimens with CoronaVac and Convidecia induced strong neutralizing antibodies in elderly, which was superior to that induced by the homologous boost, without increasing safety concerns.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04952727Key PointsQuestionDoes a heterologous immunization with recombinant adenovirus type 5-vectored vaccine (Convidecia) produced a non-inferior or superior response of neutralizing antibodies among elderly primed with two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac), compared to the homologous boostingFindingsIn this randomized clinical trial, a heterologous third dose of Convidecia resulted in a 6.2-fold (geometric mean titers: 286.4 vs 48.2), 6.3-fold (45.9 vs 7.3) and 7.5-fold (32.9 vs 4.4) increase in neutralizing antibodies against wild-type strain, Delta and Omicron variants 14 days post boosting, respectively, compared to the homologous boost with CoronaVacMeaningHeterologous prime-boost regimens with CoronaVac and Convidecia induced strong neutralizing antibodies in elderly, which was superior to that induced by the homologous boosting.

Relevant
Disruption of Hyaluronic Acid in Skeletal Muscle Induces Decreased Voluntary Activity via Chemosensitive Muscle Afferent Sensitization in Male Mice.

PEGPH20, a human recombinant hyaluronidase, has been proposed as a coadjutant to pancreatic cancer chemotherapy. In early trials, patients reported increased widespread muscle pain as the main adverse reaction to PEGPH20. To understand how PEGPH20 caused musculoskeletal pain, we systemically administered PEGPH20 to male mice and measured voluntary wheel activity and pain-related behaviors. These were paired with ex vivo electrophysiology of primary sensory neurons, whole DRG real-time PCR, and immunohistochemistry of hindpaw muscle. PEGPH20 induced significantly lower wheel running, compared with vehicle-treated animals, and decreased mechanical withdrawal thresholds 5 d after PEGPH20 injections. Chemo-sensory muscle afferents showed increased responses to noxious chemical stimulation of their receptive fields (RFs) in the PEGPH20-treated group. This was correlated with upregulation of the NGF receptor TrkA, the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) channel and ATP-sensitive channel P2X3 in the DRG. Immunohistochemistry of hindpaw muscles revealed damage to the muscle architecture and extensive infiltration of the tissue by cells of the myelomonocytic lineage 3 d after PEGPH20 injection. Peripheral macrophage ablation in macrophage Fas-induced apoptosis (MaFIA) mice, however, did not prevent the decreased voluntary activity and instead caused even lower levels of running. These results suggest that disruption of hyaluronic acid (HA) within the muscle extracellular matrix (ECM) sensitizes chemo-nociceptive muscle afferents possibly leading to altered pain-like behaviors. Ablation experiments suggest macrophages are necessary for adequate recovery of voluntary activity after HA disruption. These data support a role for HA and macrophages in tissue integrity and muscle pain development in patients taking PEGPH20.

Open Access
Relevant
Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an adenovirus type-5-vectored and protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia/ZF2001): a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

AbstractBackgroundHeterologous boost vaccination has been proposed as an option to elicit stronger and broader, or longer-lasting immunity. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of heterologous immunization with a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia) and a protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001).Methods and FindingsWe did a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults previously received one dose of Convidecia. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either ZF2001 (vaccine group) or a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) (placebo group) at either 28-day or 56-day intervals. For both regimens, all participants received the 2nd injection with ZF2001 at 4 months after a dose of ZF2001 or TIV, with three-dose schedules of Convidecia/Convidecia/ZF2001 at day 0, day 28 and month 5 (referred to as CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D28-M5)) and CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D56-M6), and two-dose schedules of CV/ZF (D0-M5) and CV/ZF (D0-M6). The primary outcome was the geometric mean titer (GMT) of the neutralizing antibodies against live SARS-CoV-2 virus 14 days after each boost vaccination. The safety outcome was 7-day reactogenicity, measured as solicited local or systemic adverse reactions after each vaccination. Between April 7, 2021, and May 6, 2021, 120 participants were enrolled, among whom 60 were randomly assigned to receive ZF2001 (n=40) or TIV (n=20) at a 28-day interval, and 60 were randomly assigned to receive ZF2001 (n=40) or TIV (n=20) at a 56-day interval. 113 (94.2%) participants received the 2nd injection with ZF2001 4 months after a dose of ZF2001 or TIV.A total of 26 participants (21.7%) reported solicited adverse events within 7 days post boost vaccinations, and all the reported adverse reactions were mild. Among participants receiving ZF001 as second dose, the GMTs of neutralizing antibodies increased to 58.4 IU/ml (42.8-79.8) in 0-28 regimen, and to 80.8 IU/ml (53.1-122.9) in 0-56 regimen at 14 days post first boost dose. The GMTs of neutralizing antibodies increased to 334.9 IU/ml (95% CI 230.4, 486.9) in C/Z/Z (D0-D28-M5) regimen, and 441.2 IU/ml (260.8, 746.4) in C/Z/Z (D0-D56-M6) regimen at 14 days after the third dose. Two-dose schedules of CV/ZF (D0-M5) and CV/ZF (D0-M6) induced comparable antibody level comparable with that elicited by three-dose schedules, with the GMTs of 282.9 IU/ml (142.5, 561.8) and 293.9 IU/ml (137.6, 627.9), respectively. Study limitations include the absence of vaccine effectiveness in real-world, and current lack of immune persistence data and the neutralizing antibodies to Omicron.ConclusionsHeterologous boosting with ZF001 following primary vaccination of Convidecia is safe and more immunogenic than a single dose of Convidecia. These results support flexibility in cooperating viral vectored vaccines and recombinant protein vaccine.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT04833101

Open Access
Relevant
Development of monoclonal antibodies and simplified sandwich ELISA for canine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin A detection

Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common canine diseases with a high mortality rate. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is the novel biomarker for early diagnosis of renal injury. Only few sandwich ELISA kits are commercially available, all of which require the use of expensive enzyme-conjugated secondary or biotinylated antibody. The aims of this study were to develop high affinity monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and simplified sandwich ELISA for canine NGAL detection. Results Recombinant canine NGAL was expressed in E. coli and purified to a high purity. Six hybridoma cell lines were generated by immunization of mice with the purified protein, all of which secreted high titers of specific mAbs. By screening 36 different antibody combinations, a pair of mAbs with high additivity and P/N ratio was selected as the capture and detection antibodies. By conjugation of the detection mAb with horse radish peroxidase, a simplified sandwich ELISA was developed with a correlation coefficient of 0.9939, detection limit of 8.28 ng/mL. The parallel test of 42 samples from healthy and AKI dogs showed the good agreement in NGAL concentrations detected by the simplified sandwich ELISA and commercial ELISA kit. Conclusions We developed canine NGAL-specific monoclonal antibodies and simplified sandwich ELISA. The simplified sandwich ELISA could replace the commercial ELISA kits for canine NGAL detection with the advantages of reduced cost and detection time.

Relevant
NIST Interlaboratory Study on Glycosylation Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies: Comparison of Results from Diverse Analytical Methods.

Glycosylation is a topic of intense current interest in the development of biopharmaceuticals because it is related to drug safety and efficacy. This work describes results of an interlaboratory study on the glycosylation of the Primary Sample (PS) of NISTmAb, a monoclonal antibody reference material. Seventy-six laboratories from industry, university, research, government, and hospital sectors in Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia submitted a total of 103 reports on glycan distributions. The principal objective of this study was to report and compare results for the full range of analytical methods presently used in the glycosylation analysis of mAbs. Therefore, participation was unrestricted, with laboratories choosing their own measurement techniques. Protein glycosylation was determined in various ways, including at the level of intact mAb, protein fragments, glycopeptides, or released glycans, using a wide variety of methods for derivatization, separation, identification, and quantification. Consequently, the diversity of results was enormous, with the number of glycan compositions identified by each laboratory ranging from 4 to 48. In total, one hundred sixteen glycan compositions were reported, of which 57 compositions could be assigned consensus abundance values. These consensus medians provide community-derived values for NISTmAb PS. Agreement with the consensus medians did not depend on the specific method or laboratory type. The study provides a view of the current state-of-the-art for biologic glycosylation measurement and suggests a clear need for harmonization of glycosylation analysis methods.

Open Access
Relevant